Welzow's Fencers
Un Su-24MR du 11.ORAP surpris au-dessus de la Mer Baltique. © Flygvapnet. A M-101 Shtik (Bayonet) Side Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) was located inside its nose. It was possible to scan an area of 4 to 24 kilometers wide on each side alternatively with a resolution of 5 to 7.5 meters. The extension of the white paint behind the nose radome was a ruse to hide the large lateral dielectric panels of the SLAR. An AP-402M camera (> Link) rotary prism-equipped panoramic camera with a focal length of 90.5 mm was located under the fuselage right behind the front nose wheel. The Kadr (Frame) complex included an A-100 oblique camera with a focal length of 1000 mm mounted under the left reactor air intake. This complex made it possible to jettison the exposed films housed inside a parachute-equipped cassette in flight when necessary; however, we have not been able to find how the cassette was ejected. An Aist-M (Stork) TV reconnaisssance system (> Link) also found its place inside the fuselage, just behind the AP-402M camera. Finally, the Zima (Winter) IR sensor formed a small fairing that could be found set back under the right engine air intake. A data link was used to transmit the images collected by TV, IR and laser means to a ground station. The aircraft position and the time also were recorded for each picture taken. The digital data were received and analyzed with the Posrednik (Intermediary) mobile complex mounted on two trucks. Like all the "Fencer," the Su-24MR had on its back a big air scoop feeding a heat exchanger to cool the onboard systems it carried. However, the one of the "Fencer-E" seemed bigger due to its rounded top. The latter in fact housed the antenna of the ShRK-1 large band data link transmitter. The Su-24MR had no offensive capability: the Orion-A attack radar, the Kayra-24 weapons system and the GSh-6-23M cannon that the "Fencer-D" attack aircraft carried were not mounted. However, the Rel'yef' terrain-following radar was still present. In order to ensure its survival, this variant enjoyed the remarkable Su-24M self-defense suite that included on the late production batches: an SPO-15 Bereza (Birch) radar warning and homing radar receiver, a L-082 Mak-UL (Poppy) IR missile detector, a SPS-161 Geran-F (Geranium) radar jamming system, an SPS-143 ECM complex and APP-50A flare launchers. "Fencer-F" were wired to carry R-60 or R-60M (AA-8 "Aphid") short-range IR air to air missiles under their wings. The 11.ORAP aircraft often were observed with APU-60-2 adapters for two R-60 missiles under the left wing outboard pylon. As part of their mission and in addition to their standard onboard equipment, the Su-24MR from Welzow always carried one or two specialized pods such as the Konteyner n°2 that was a SRS-14 Tangazh (Pitch) ELINT pod (> Link) mounted under the fuselage or the Konteyner n°1 Shpil'-2M (Spire) (> Link) designed for laser low-level reconnaissance. The images collected from an altitude of 400 meters were almost of photographic quality thanks to a 25 cm resolution. The laser system that could be used both by day and by night could cover a strip of land with a width equal to four times the aircraft altitude. The data collected were transmitted to the ground in real time with the data link. Konteyner n°3 Efir-1M (Ether) was attached only under the right wing. It was designed for measuring the levels of radioactivity in the air. The data were recorded on magnetic tapes or transmitted to the ground via the data link connection. Other external stores often observed at Welzow were the impressive 3000-liter PTB-3000 drop tanks. They were always present on the flight line, resting on wooden brackets. The "Fencer" of the 11.ORAP had a particular feature that they only shared - within the 16.VA - with the Su-24 of the 497.BAP from Grossenhain and the Su-24M of the 116.GBAP from Brand. It was a retractable in-flight refueling boom that was centered in front of the windscreen. However, unlike the aircraft of the 116.GBAP that used UPAZ-1A Sakhalin in-flight refueling pods (> Link), the Su-24MR did not practiced in-flight refueling using the "buddy-buddy" technique between them. The "Fencer-F" indeed always carried a reconnaissance pod under its belly and consequently were not equipped to carry the Sakhalin refueling pod. Electronic warfareHaving lost its Yak-28PP electronic warfare aircraft in 1986, the third squadron of the 11.ORAP was back in 1989 when it received all the operational Su-24MP "Fencer-F" i.e. eight aircraft. They were therefore the only aircraft of this type deployed outside the territory of the USSR. The Su-24MP (MP for Modifikatsirovanyy Postanovshchik-Pomekh - Modified Jammer) - sometimes compared to the US EF-111 "Raven" - was expected to become the successor of the Yak-28PP within the VVS. The latter had been kept in service for a long time for lack of a replacement and could no longer claim to provide protection for Su-24 attack formations. Two Su-24M were modified to serve as a test bench and the first aircraft transformed with electronic warfare equipment designated T-6MP-25 first flew on March 14, 1980, four months before the first Su-24MR prototype. In addition to the two prototypes, production of the T-6MP alias "Article 46" or Su-24MP, was carried out in Novosibirsk from 1983 in parallel with that of the T-6MR alias "Article 48" or Su-24MR. This was limited to only 10 aircraft. Two of them were transferred to the Lipetsk Operational Conversion Center, while the others joined the Yak-28PP of 118.OAPREB (Otde'lniy Aviatsionnyy Polk Radioelektronnoy Borb'i - Separate Electronic Warfare Aviation Regiment) at Chortkov in the Ukrainian SSR before finally being transferred to Welzow. The Su-24MP could easily be distinguished from the other "Fencer" variants by a large rectangular antenna fairing placed under its nose radome and by the two hockey stick shaped antennas of the SPS-5 Fasol' (Kidney Bean) jamming system located behind the engines air intakes as also was the case for the Yak-28PP. Like the MR variant, the MP version had no Orion-A attack radar but kept the Rel'yef' terrain-following radar. Its nose also was painted white to hide the rectangular dielectric panels of the jamming systems mounted inside the nose radome making them quite similar to common "Fencers." The in-flight refueling boom was maintained, but without the ability to carry an UPAZ pod. On the other hand, the aircraft of the 11.ORAP regularly carried a ventral pod resembling a Shpil'-2M pod on the Su-24MR. However, this was completely different equipment. The "Fencer-F" could carry two ventral pods type simply designated Konteyner n°1 and Konteyner n°2 in the manner of those of the Su-24MR. The first pod housed SPS-6 Los' (Moose) and Mimoza (Mimosa) jammers while the second was an Avtomat-DU automatic decoy launcher designed to jam radars. The Landysh (Lily of the Valley) electronic warfare suite of the Su-24MP needed larger cooling systems. These planes, alone or in formation, would have been responsible for jamming the enemy's air defense and research systems in order to clear the way for the bombers. The second prototype was photographed with a full load of 100 kg bombs - but does that mean the Su-24MP was to be employed as a bomber as well? The Su-24MP could rely on different systems common to the M and MR variants already described and carried R-60 missiles to ensure its survivability. The mysterious Landysh suite unfortunately did not meet the expectations placed in it, which explains the low number of aircraft in service.
Un Su-24MR se présente à l'atterrissage au crépuscule à Welzow. © C.Lofting. notes(1) Six aircraft would have remained operational with the 118.OAPREB, while two aircraft would have joined the 4.TsBP i PLS (Tsenter Boevoy Podgotovki i Pereuchivaniya Letnogo Sostava - Combat Training and Flight Personnel Conversion Center) at Lipetsk. The six aircraft became Ukrainian after the dissolution of the USSR and they would have finished their careers stored at the Nikolayev Aviation Repair Plant (ARZ).
|
|||||||||||||